CO-97: Bundled into Another Service
CO-97 means the payer applied a bundling edit and folded one procedure into another, paying only the primary code even though both services were performed.
Why payers issue CO-97
- Two codes hit an NCCI edit pair and the second was denied as inclusive
- A distinct-service modifier (59, XS, XU) was missing or unsupported
- The procedures looked like the same session when they were separate
- A global-period E/M was bundled without modifier 24/25/57
Is it recoverable? Recoverable when the second service was genuinely separate — the appeal proves distinctness with the right modifier and documentation.
Common questions
What does CO-97 mean?
CO-97 means the payer applied a bundling edit and folded one procedure into another, paying only the primary code even though both services were performed. The benefit for this service is included in the payment/allowance for another service/procedure that has already been adjudicated.
How do I appeal or fix a CO-97 denial?
Recoverable when the second service was genuinely separate — the appeal proves distinctness with the right modifier and documentation. Common causes: two codes hit an NCCI edit pair and the second was denied as inclusive; a distinct-service modifier (59, XS, XU) was missing or unsupported; the procedures looked like the same session when they were separate; a global-period E/M was bundled without modifier 24/25/57.
Is a CO-97 denial worth appealing?
Recoverable when the second service was genuinely separate — the appeal proves distinctness with the right modifier and documentation. You only pay on what's actually recovered, so there's no cost to working the ones that are winnable.
Upload your remittance and see what's recoverable.
A free assessment reads your denials and underpayments and shows your real recoverable number. No risk, paid only on what we recover.